🔗 Share this article

I have a few thoughts regarding that comments made by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's win over the American player in the New York major last eight. Look – the athlete represents American, Fowler is American – and athletic competitions frequently encourage nationalism. Some letdown was understandable. Instead, Fowler brought up the ongoing absence of American men at the majors: none of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the tournament.

Everyone love a storyline, myself included. But really. Suppose Fritz defeated Djokovic for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, whom Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the last seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz said in post-match interviews after the loss that he in fact preferred his draw, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the top three competitors in the sport in succession. Fritz is well justified to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match who else in their right mind had the drought of US winners on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, 28, is ranked fourth in the world entering the upcoming year-end championships and has won his last six encounters over No 3 the German with increasing ease. Presumably he might claim that position for himself in the future. But evidently that right now, that’s as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s elite serve and concussive strength on both front side and backhand are sufficiently enough to defeat most opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is frequently helpless. The last several seasons has seen the curious emergence of lanky, towering players who can nevertheless move around with the alarming quickness and fluidity of smaller players. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he seldom steal a point that the opponent was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty severe restriction on his potential.

Fritz has made a several dramatic, improbable advancements over the years. Early on of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the top 30. Two years after, he was sniffing the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly exploded to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a declining Serbian, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing slump of US male players lifting major titles when Fritz had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just too much and the respect for the magnitude of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

The American's play in that very quarter-final should have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a win that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz creating numerous chances to break. But the champion saved break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the point of frustration. When he eventually did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a horrendous game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and forced him to use far too much energy to win it. Facing match points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve floated to the sky. He prolonged the match twice on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, only a consequence of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was quite ironclad evidence that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of Djokovic, that lost to the Spaniard in the next round and never particularly seem like he believed he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his athletic abilities now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to make up for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating the American to prevail, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that suggested he would.

The American is an asset to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, thoughtful voice in media sessions, more so than almost anyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, prepared to not only say his emotions or the tactic he felt decided a match, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States not spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Since Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is in fact highly unlikely for everybody else. {